Thursday, October 21, 2010

Blaming Hindus and the Govt.

There are some Muslim theorticians in India, who advocate that the history telling i)Muslim invaders of India looted temples and demolished places of worship ii)Aurangazip is a bad ruler are not correct. They also argue that after Independence, Hindus have applied to the Archeaological Dept. obtained permission from them, constructed Hindu temples on it by demolishing unworshipped monumental mosques and tombs thereby erode religious characters. Though nobody would believe them, they continue to emit poisonous lies. Only terrorists who have taken toll of innocent lives and face capital punishment the world over can use it to cover their acts of shame.

So people should be watchful for those theoriticians and organize to oppose it whenever it raises it head by publishing articles in newspapers and use the media, blaming Hindus and the Government on that basis. The Govt. should also make a note of such theoriticians and watch their activities and nip terrorism in the bud.

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

Merchantilists-state nexus!

One Sudhansu Mohanty has written an artile in the Indian Express. He writes:

"Merchantilism broadly refers to the system where the state and merchants are in cahoots to ostensibly bring about welfare of the citizens whle it actually enriched the latter with theformer's regulations benefitting them.

"Look around and cast your eyes no further than the commonwealth Games and see the parallel with mercantilism. HOw and why did the Govt. select a merntilist as the prima donna to run the Games, who in turn created his own sub-merchantilists of sons and daughters and spawned a culture of 'nephewism'?..

The author wants to stress that some merchantilists (virtually run the Govt.) and the state have created that reeks of corruption, nepotism ineptitude. Even in the depositting of black money in Swiss and foreign banks by Indians issue the Govt. maintained a stony silence and refused to act. It was doubtless a case of neo-mercantilism. He further states that neo-mercantilism believes that the nations resources can and should be looted but only by a select minority. This select minority will then work the system to enrich itself and ironically add to the GDP.

In short he ventures to say: mercantilists and the state loot the exchequer and resources.

It is true that looting of exchequer by handful of merchants, corruption, nepotism and ineptitude are rampant. But it is only the by-product or the off-shoot of the nexsus between the mercantilists and the state. Either of them have no plans nor have planned to create or manufacture these things. If they really have any plan to do so, the Ayodhya issue will be resolved in a jiffy.

They can i) move out the buried bodies with tombs adjoining the erstwhile Babri Masjid, enmasse to a safe distance, such as in the case of Aswan Dam in Arabia and build a mosque there. (When Aswan Dam was built, The Govt. ordered that Burial grounds, mosques should be taken up from the earth without any damage and to plant them at faraway places.)

ii)build up Ram temple in Ramjanmaboomi and

iii) build up shopping complexes, amusements and residential houses/apartments ..

all at the cost of exchequer, of course, they are matters of contract and sponsor mercantilists and their sub-mercantilists can earn billions of money.

So one need not hold pessimisstic views about the STATE. The Indian communists themselves have faith in this kind of parliamentary democracy. Therefore one should try to organize people against such evils.